I think price is a huge revolution. I can go from LA to Iceland for $400 RT. The shape of planes is the same, but the shape of air travel is completely revolutionized.

Yeah, i’ll meme that

https://imgur.com/a/85dq7

Good man, I’m glad. I will always think of you as the HOSTS guy.

I agree, summary has a snotty tone. Is it a good for cutting edge security features to be expanded to mainstream browsers? I’m happy for it.

I don't think you understand what "underused infrastructure" means. The optimum density on a freeway lane is 50 cars per mile, or cars approx 4-5 car lengths apart. This gives you the maximum flow (cars per hour). If you add more cars, flow goes down, and your infrastructure becomes sub-optimal. So, now you understand. you're welcome!

I'm pretty sure you don't know a damn thing about traffic, infrastructure utilization, or tube cloggage.

I think this is the way it has to be. keep ratcheting up the requirements in order to keep the lane free. Some metrics: a freeway lane moves best when it has 50 cars per mile. bumper to bumper, it has 100+ cars per mile. Gridlock, 200 cars per mile.

So if you have a 4 lane freeway that is bumper to bumper at rush hour, that is 400 cars per mile. you add a fifth carpool lane that you want to keep to 50 cars per mile. This means that only 10-15% of cars should qualify for the carpool lane. You need to change your requirements to keep the qualifications that low.

locally, we're trying to bump up the 2+ carpool to 3+.

cars move one person at a time. a bus moves 40 people. a single bus only lane can take 3 lanes of cars off the freeway. it makes less congestion for everybody.

i hate when cars are in bus-only lanes. The purpose of the lanes is to allow buses to bypass traffic. it doesn't help when its' so clogged by cars that the lane moves at the same speed as the general purpose lane. thanks a lot, cars!

a lot of people say that TPTB in government are part of a wid-ranging conspiracy to exploit children in a sexual way. I think the FBI would have to be implicated in some way, because there's no way that TPTB would let FBI get the drop on them.

> It's not like they're out there creating the CP.

#PIZZAGATE

now if only anon would finally release the trump tax returns!

go back to /pol/

apple designed and manufactures the processor in-house. the casings are machined in-house. presumably they are buying the screens and the batteries from somebody. But that's about it.

I think of all the statements made, they all apply to the apple watch. there is an underlying tribal mentality, where some people love apple and some people hate it. With the iphone specifically, I think some people are entranced by android because it is perceived as "open" while iphone is a "walled garden". I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with any tribal viewpoints, just acknowledging that they are present.

WRT apple watch, just according to the sales numbers it is beating the pants off any other smart watch. and despite its limited funcitonality and tetherment to a phone, it actually accomplishes a whole lot.

tbh I am seeing more iWatches in the field. this says to me, if somebody is using it every day for more than a month, then the novelty factor is gone and they are getting real utility.

apple watch has nowhere to go but up. they're still on their first generation form factor and technology. there will likely be major improvements later this year, such as thinner and adding more features. Maybe even some day, untethering from the phone.

I had one myself, but I got rid of it. you know what made the difference? the fact that the screen is off until you raise it. there was always a split-second lag that made it impossible to just casually glance at the time. instead, it became a deliberate action where you had to pause everything and do it.

if apple can make the screen be on all the time, then I would greatly consider the iwatch again.