Comment Still missing the point (Score 1) 70
And so, why didn't they use one of the source instead? From the coal plants it's 300x more.
And so, why didn't they use one of the source instead? From the coal plants it's 300x more.
It's really very personal.
And it's an all-in-one Internet terminal. Most of the applications require Internet.
This leaves the camera feature, but I would be ok with the name.
Dealing with people moving with their eyes (nose) on the screen is especially difficult and annoying.
They made a special walk lane for them in Asia somewhere, years ago (one place, one city).
I'd like to have:
* A name for them, like you said
* A strategy. Currently I decided they have the lowest priority, and so I barge in, even if they collide a bit it doesn't really matter because they are unaware and just correct themselves.
And yes, that sounds a bit silly, but it highlights how silly this whole thing is.
Next logical idea would be to not dig out the coal from the mines, and instead sell the biochar to clients that would have bought the coal to burn it.
This reminds me people interested in pumping back the very dilluted CO2 from the atmosphere, with a complex and costly process, while there are concentrated CO2 sources (coal plants) that are ignored, and natural means to pump this CO2 (forests). Silly projects.
That said, the KDE team did something against the users: removing the ability to set the window's border width & color, and the gradient & color & 3D texture for the window's title bar. (I'm against the flat design for clarity)
It's maddening how developers remove user's freedom, and in the GNU/Linux ecosystem, no less... The Gnome team is one of the worst here. Firefox is next.
Sorry for the rant.
Pump it from coal plant exhaust instead of the atmosphere!
CO2 in air: 0.04% , hard to capture in large quantity;
CO2 in coal plant exhaust: 14% (vol) : much more effective.
It goes into the atmosphere anyway if you don't capture it, why are you waiting for it to be diluted from 14 to 0.04 !!!
It looks like people were looking for something and methodically swept the ground on a large scale.
These lines would then have no meaning in themselves.
Were they looking for treasure, were they trying to collect all the rocks of a meteorite?
If it's just a matter of pointy ears it should be okay.
Maybe not for beastfolk and oni, since there's no horns option I guess. No furry ears neither...
The implication is that they can also eliminate the part of the transmission latency that is a function of the distance of the end points.
No they can't because to read the teleported quantum states they need additional information that is sent through classic channels, not faster than light.
Why is this forgotten every time?
There is a difference between a game depicting some reality where there is sexism, and a game made by sexist people who promote sexism.
That's why the sexism rating should be two ratings:
One rating for how much sexist clichés there are in the game, has there are in real life.
One rating for how much the game could induce sexist behavior, as it may be done on purpose by sexist people.
(this late posting is more a note to myself...)
Our car is badly scratched. It's second hand and one of us made additional scratch to it (non intentional).
I don't think anyone would be interested in robing such a car and we feel quite relaxed regarding theft risk (and when going through tight places).
The Shell Prelude vessel is larger:
Once complete, the facility will have decks measuring 488 by 74 metres (that's more than 1600 feet long and 243 feet wide).
It is built in Goeje, South Korea, and this will be the largest hull ever sent to sea.
Slowly and surely the unix crept up on the Nintendo user ...