I had printers on Win9x/NT machines in the early 2000s do this from time to time. With or without service packs. Everyone just assumed the printer was possessed, we just power cycled the printer, and we moved on with our lives. Obligatory video: https://youtu.be/ALNV4ZW33fA

Now what I'd like to see is based on what ARM and Qualcomm spent on this lawsuit start to finish, what could each company's R&D teams have accomplished with those respective expenditures. Both companies have a vested interest in seeing ARM architecture market share increase.

WiFi is for the toys. All the important stuff is hardwired to gigabit connections.

Excel falls flat on it's face, wreaks havoc, or generally just misbehaves because time and time again people insist on using it for purposes it was never designed for. I've lost track of how many times someone has tried to reinvent Access inside Excel.

Imperfect but good is right. Over the last 25-ish years using Linux I've have a few bizarre issues related to XWindows. Oh well, who hasn't. Eventually I've found fixes for all of them, so I call that a good thing.

I have a vanity license plate that makes reference to XWindows. I drive an Xterra. Not sure what that says about me.

I believe the current system allows for a providers bandwidth to be averaged in order to show the "overall" performance and service being delivered in order to satisfy the requirements. This creates the situation where low speed, low price plans get dropped in order to prop up the average. Then they ratchet up the speed of consumer plans to speeds that very few single family homes could ever saturate. Again, done to inflate the average. The FCC should add that the lower tier plans should be required to stay in place as to not taint the averages. No gaming the system, Personally I see no need for anything more then what I subscribe to now, a 75 Mbps plan. I rarely max it out. The other plan offerings, starting at 300 Mbps, offer me no value at all. My provider keeps pushing me in that direction despite this.

If YouTube really wants us to watch ads then it is way pass due to allow us the viewers to rate the ads and send that info back to the advertisers. No one wants bad advertising, right?

Announcement is back up, someone must have had the wrong time zone. https://www.qualcomm.com/news/...

Let's not forget what Twitter's original purpose was, publishing SMS content to the web. Dorsey is spot on with his take. They turned a protocol into a company. A very dumb company as far as I'm concerned.

Company who's goal is market saturation upset with their market saturation. Hey Comcast, how is that unwritten policy of geographic monopolies amongst cable TV providers working out for you now?

Microsoft just filed copyright claims on the Server 2003 and XP build videos. Guess that confirms it for sure. That's bizarre to say the least. Not like we are looking at the code, just 22 & 10 minutes of compiler output. I didn't know status messages were copyrighted.

Your article title isn't quite on point, it should read: "Uber, a software company, decides to sell software." Now the pesky problem of Uber realizing that they should just be in the software business and get out of the transportation business.