It's a good thing customers can't just change the MAC address of their wifi adapter.

AI isn't going to teach kids "critical thinking skills"; it's going to teach kids to use AI to do their "thinking"

"Trump is clearly trying to let Russia win their war against Ukraine" is really valuable insight. Thank you.

I mean, yeah? no shit? Did anything in my reply indicate otherwise?

What kind of question is this? If we want to prevent a similar outbreak from happening, of course we would want to know the origin of Covid.

If we understood the origin of Covid and whether it was preventable, you don't know what would change? The steps that could be taken to prevent this from happening again is what would change. Again, what kind of question IS this?

Let's say, Luigi's Mansion

Yes, the technology that literally just makes stuff up is definitely what will ensure that spreadsheets contain accurate data.

You literally can't trust the output of "A.I." to be correct. Ever

Heat rises and due to the square-inverse function, they lose a LOT of it if they don't drill deep enough. A little back of the napkin math shows that their break-even point is somewhere between 4000 - 6000 feet. But once they get past 6K, they can start drilling WIDER (picture a reverse funnel) which mostly undoes the loss. They could probably stop at 10K, but I can see why they'd want an additional 3000ft as a "buffer"

The fact that the cars all have paid drivers in them, instead of being self-driving, wasn't a tip-off to you that they failed at being able to self-drive?

...on a 1) one-way road, 2) that he built, 3) where the only other cars are Teslas

Normal people figured out long ago that Elon Musk isn't a real-life Tony Stark, he's a real-life Lyle Lanley

Any article title that starts with the words "Elon Musk" should only contain variations of the words "worthless" and "fraud"

None of this contradicts what I said.

The comment I responded to literally asked for replies:

You're telling me that you're so illiterate that you don't understand what a question mark means? Just holy shit.

No one said it's a complex problem to solve. Have you ever considered reading the fucking article before sharing your thoughts on it?

Did I ask for your opinion on how these cameras work?

You're seriously arguing that capturing an image in one single-frame doesn't offer higher fidelity than older technologies? Without offering a single citation to support your argument? Incredible.