The problem you miss is that some of us would rather not even pay for the addled video. Prime didn't change its fee when they added video, so give me a video-free alternative at a lower price. I resent paying for something I don't use.

If you haven’t heard, the voice actor for John Redcorn was murdered last week by a homophobe. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/a...

When was this? In the shows I remember, the only thing worse than the "special effects" was the plots.

And the whole "private jets" and Bill Gates is a bad faith distraction used as a punching bag excuse as to why we can't do anything about the issue until we deal with those "dirty liberal elites" first, an argument straight from the playbook of other end of the "wealthy, powerful" interests. You can claim climate science is a distraction but this a bad faith distraction with malicious intent. And we know they are malicious liars because they stand in the way of any regulations that would curb that behavior like a carbon tax or restrictions on small plane use or fucking anything.

F1TV isn't available in my country. I still subscribe to it and pay for it using a VPN.

For decades, Forbes has assessed his wealth, currently estimating it at $4.1 billion as of early April 2025. Meanwhile, Bloomberg estimated his wealth at $7.08 billion in January 2025, although Trump himself claims a much higher net worth.

Attributing the statistical attributes of a population to the individuals in it is fallacious. In other words its junk science.

No, its using population data to assign values to a population. Insurance by its nature distributes collective risk to all the individuals in the particular population. That is its purpose.

Attributing the statistical attributes of a population to the individuals in it is fallacious. In other words its junk science. Which is why this is so dangerous.