Comment Re:CRWD (Score 1) 33
"There's a sucker born every minute."
Just one per minute... PT Barnum was a hell of an optimist.
"There's a sucker born every minute."
Just one per minute... PT Barnum was a hell of an optimist.
Of the many counties I’ve visited, USA has always felt the most third world.
I think they built lots of infrastructure post WWII into the 70s, but being built primarily on capitalism (rather than a mix of socialism and capitalism like most other countries) and don’t tax me bro, have let all that infrastructure decline.
The US made the critical mistake of assuming that a private organisation would be motivated to take care of infrastructure. They aren't, extract every dollar from customers and run it into the ground before running off to Washington to beg for public money to upgrade it which just gets given to shareholders and execs..
So all the crap that got privatised decades ago hasn't been upgraded since. UK did the same thing, so did some Australian states which is why Perth, Western Australia, one of the most isolated western cities, has cheaper power than the well connected, heavily populated eastern states. W.A. didn't privatise it's power company (it corporatised it, run as an independent company but the government is the only shareholder. Govt can fire the board but the board runs the company. No profit motive either).
If you're charging $3+ for a cup of coffee, treat those customers well and give them some damn free internet. Speed cap it to 3 Mbps per device if you absolutely must to discourage the moochers, if you absolutely must.
Also, use that usage data to help plan for staffing levels accordingly.
At first I thought... "where are you getting a coffee for $3"... Then I realised you were thinking of that burnt dishwater Americans pass off as coffee, not a decent esspresso based drink.
Even in Colombia I'm paying near enough to $3 for it (11,000 pesos). Seriously, if you're ordering one drink and staying an hour, its not the cafe that's the problem.
the coffee-shop side had loudish, energetic music and the office was quiet.
Some restaurants actually do the loud upbeat music thing in order to keep customers from hogging tables. A chicken tender place near me practically blasts their music (which is primarily a playlist of current pop), which certainly does tend to drive off everyone who isn't a member of Gen Z.
I am glad this is not a "thing" in the country where I live. Most places don't try to shoo away customers but by the same token, your average Brit is too embarrassed to sit in a fast food restaurant for a few hours to work.
The only restaurant that plays loudish music around my town that isn't a bar or club of some description is a branch of Five Guys and well, the music is part of their "American Diner" shtick.
So then you casually admit that it is true that Trump intends to run a dictatorship. That's the only way you can force people to do things they don't want to do at wages far less than what they want. I only hope that Canada can keep out the dumb ones while accepting the smart ones.
The smart ones will get out early, the dumb ones will wait until the only way across will be a leaky boat on the great lakes.
The curse of terminal stupidity is to assume everyone else is as dumb as they are.
There's no personal responsibility anymore. Kyle Schutt can go and fire people and no doubt destroy their family's lives with a keyboard and a login, but when he's careless in the execution of his own job, some slashdotters only blame 2FA or passkeys. It's sad what America has been reduced to. A lot of hot air about defending freedom and protecting their homes with guns, then meekly accepting Kyle's antics.
On that,
Dearest NRA,
Regarding your promises and ostensible raison d'etre, you seem to have forgotten to rise up against an oppressive government that has taken over your country.
Yours Sarcastically
Everyone who saw though your bullshit from the start.
users can not be blamed...
Good news! No one will be held accountable for the consequences of this.
That will certainly be the case as the Trump administration is allergic to responsibility and accountability (except when you have displeased dear leader).
Tech workers need to be held to a higher standard, which is why we get paid more. My standard day starts with getting a coffee, logging onto my non-privileged account with a password that regularly expires, connecting to VPN, using 2FA to access the secure password portal and generating my first password of the day to access my privileged account, which lasts a maximum of 12 hours via RDP to a secure server... If I have to access client servers I need to get a randomly generated password for each customer. Nothing secure is kept on my local machine and that's how it should be.
Developers will bitch and moan about doing this... Imagine how much the average end user will complain, think about the kind of person who says "but what can they do with my account" as they start their fifth cyber incident by running a cryptolocker.
It's a bit of a faff and it can get a lot worse but I understand it because I deal with systems and data that can cause millions in headaches if the wrong person gets to them. So my job _is_ about minimising that risk.
I have heard that some people have been able to return their consoles to the retailers in the UK, but only Reddit posts so no idea if it is true or not. Legally it is a grey area because it hasn't been tested. People were able to partial or full refunds on the PS3 when Sony removed Linux support via a mandatory (to keep playing games) update, but that's a bit different. If someone did go to court it would be against the retailer, as the consumer rights make them responsible for the product, and they would have a very hard time getting Sony to assist them with detailed evidence to back up the console ban. But then again, the consumer might find it difficult to provide any evidence that they were innocent. It would probably come down to the judge and how much effort the retailer made to defend.
Current consumer protections, even in the UK, do not go far enough with cases like this.
If a company can deliberately damage or block a device from operating, especially offline then you should be entitled to a full refund regardless of age. Online services are a different kettle of fish (still abused by Sony/MS/Nintendo, which is why I remain a PC gamer despite how tempting a Switch is) but the physical device should still work as sold.
And if not opposed now, this kind of shenanigan will be coming to a lot of other devices that can be connected to the internet, TVs, fridges, washing machines, et al. Just wait until your washing machine has no physical buttons and has to be operated via an "app". I'd like this kind of thing nipped in the bud so the only time we see such a future is in our imaginations.
It's not a good sign that they have to leak potential products for 2027 to Bloomberg to keep the Apple faithful on the hook through 2 dull years. The robot sounds a lot like their car project (ie. why are they making this?) and the smart glasses may have a shot, but are by no means a slam dunk. Under Cook they've had more cancelled or failed new product lines than successes now.
Apple has been passe for years now. Long gone are the days where a placid press would wait with baited breath for any nugget of crap from Apple so they could write 12 articles that would get fanboys frothing and creaming themselves.
The articles aren't bringing in the eyeballs and even most of the fanboys have realised it's just a phone.
So now Apple is just another phone company but doesn't want to acknowledge it... Like a 35 yr old diva who was mean to everyone in her 20s because she was hot and could get away with it suddenly realises she has no friends and her looks are gone. That'll be Apple in a few years.
As for this "leak"... for a long time I've said if you want to know what Apple will be doing next year, look at what Android did 2 years ago and discard half of it.
I thought that leaks were unintentional, by definition. i.e. if Apple did it intentionally, it's not a leak, it's stealth marketing.
Congratulations, after 20 years you've discovered Apple's secret.
I simply don't get all those stories on
When you are a gamer, you realise it's only around certain types of games, usually heavily monetised ones that seem to attract the most toxic of audiences.
Step back, play a nice strategy, indie or story driven game and relax.
Eh. I get this. This is one of those shitty pay-to-win gacha games. In this case , they granted too much game money, then took it back out, in many/most cases leaving people with negative money and
It was a nasty cash grab response to their own error and its backfiring hard.
Yep, mobile game company releases same shitty game on PC and finds out the hard way that PC players won't take the same abuse that mobile gamers will... and in the process finds out there is even a limit to the amount of abuse mobile gamers will take.
Shoulda released on console. Activision has been releasing the same COD for 18 years now.
It's pretty cool that in a population of about 8.8 million, it only takes 55k signatures to trigger a referendum (about 0.006% of the population). I'm not saying that's always a good idea but Switzerland has, as far as I am aware, a long history of putting policy like this directly to the electorate.
It's a situation that works well for the Swiss because they're Swiss.
There aren't enough fringe lunatics to hold the rest of the population to ransom, most Swiss are generally considerate, rational and moderate.
Just keep the money rolling in.
Yeah. The correct answer from the judge should be, "No. Fuck you. You've been criminally overcharging consumers by taking extortionate app store fees for seventeen years while preventing competition on your platform in a severely market-distorting way. Someone finally had the brass cojones to sue you and won. You can appeal all you want to, but your odds of success on appeal are nowhere near good enough to warrant injunctive relief, because what you did is so egregious."
The best response would be to tell them to put their money where their mouth is. A seriously large per day lien (in excess of what they'd earn per day) that will be returned upon successful appeal but surrendered on an unsuccessful one.
I suspect that a European judge would just tell them to go do one... but I believe this case is in the US.
Microsoft effectively raised *low-end* Surface prices by discontinuing base models. The high end prices remained the same.
This is the net result of Trumps tariffs.
Microsoft weren't the first and wont be the last.
Distributors are killing off the budget items because the margins are too low and leaving the more expensive items that have larger margins. What this means for you is higher prices and less choice.
It'll happen to everything as even the stuff made in the US will be using parts made in other countries.
Backed up the system lately?