Comment Re:Betteridge says "No". (Score 1) 82
This is the response I’ve been looking for - one that acknowledges the issue and points out that it’s primarily a problem for places rich people (top 10-20%, not just the usual 1% boogeyman) like to vacation. Being in that demographic and spending more than half my life in the other types of towns you describe, I’ve been acutely aware of the challenges and opportunities of both vacation towns and, for lack of a better term, “80% towns”.
Vacation towns, for example ski resorts, have struggled with this for decades. My 80% friends who wanted to work at them (primarily to ski when they’re not working) always had to live 30 minutes or more away. With more demand on these towns from Zoom workers, this has just gotten worse.
This is the main problem the original article is addressing. It’s real and has been around for a while. Without an incentive such as skiing, there’s little reason for many of the low wage workers to put up with with increased hassle of living away. Foreign workers have filled the gap, but they run into the same issues.
The parent’s post, on the other hand, hits one key factor left out of the conversation of Zoom towns: there are thousands of nice, small towns around the country (I’m in the US, so use that as my point of reference) that were decimated over the years by factories closing and Walmart’s killing local businesses. These are ripe for revitalization. There is enough supply that they likely will be able to support a healthier mix of incomes. And if we continue to see a rise in the income floor, those really will be healthy incomes that allow everyone to feel a sense of belonging in their community.
It won’t happen overnight, but I hope this is the first step towards revitalizing the “80% towns” and building an economy that supports all people, regardless of their location.
For the ski/vacation towns, the top 20% will just have to find a way to make it worthwhile for the service workers.