Why stop at the endorser?
Surely, everyone involved in the entire ad campaign is equally liable.

Obviously, it is dependent on the location in which you are speaking.
If you are speaking English in France, it should be done in a French accent.
When I visited New York, my midwestern accent changes quite naturally at this point.
Do they not teach this school anymore?

What I want from AI regarding movies, is the ability to prompt stuff like "play me this movies but with these actors" or "this movie but in that time period" or "ever character but that one is a puppet" and have it play it me, for my own personal entertainment, with zero external costs, save the AI system.

Like when he said the 5070 would deliver "4090 performance at $549". It doesn't.

Exactly.

There are many cases where fair use and profit can and do mingle. Every work of parody made commercially available would be a good start. Any sort of critique or commentary, whether it be reviews or a track-by-track breakdown of album x, falls squarely under fair use. It doesn't matter if it's a college dissertation, a random youtuber, or a commercially driven media conglomerate doing it.

Roll back copyright right terms to their original lengths and sort out the little bit of infringement left over. Current lengths do nothing but steal from the public domain.

Whatever happened to the 300gb holographic discs that were "coming soon" in like 2010? I guess it never caught on.

I quit when they wouldn't offer a single viewer 4k plan. Most tvs are now 4k, so I shouldn't have to pay for a multiple viewer plan just to match today's standard resolution.

Hulu is bad in an inverse way, where only some of their content can be played in 4k on certain devices, whose manufacturers probably payola-ed to get access to. My Pixel 6, which was older than my tv was granted this access and I could cast in 4k. That's downright ridiculous, when the stream should be wholly device agnostic.

I loved my Galaxy S5 exactly for that reason.

That's way too low. It should be up at least equal to what the violator would face vis-à-vis those FBI warnings. "Up to 5 years in prison and/or $250,000 fine" per wrong DMCA.

Funny how dealerships get this weird protection racket, but every other brick and mortar industry had to fight internet purchases to the death.

You'd think it'd take at least that long just to pack the order and get in on the correct devilry vehicle.

Isn't this just Steam Box all over again?

The claimant should have to pay, if their claims are found to be false. It should be the exact penalty that an infringer would have to pay, per missed stream.