Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: I really can't sympathize with Delta (Score 1) 63

No. Crowdstrike took down all Windows machines. It took hours to a day to get most of them back up for everyone.

Southwest's application stack was most resilient and they had booking systems up and running within the day. Other airlines had their application layer synced overnight.

Delta's application layer could not recover. If all their computers had rebooted at nearly the same time, they'd have the same situation where they were offline for days. Those cascading failures had nothing to do with the initial Windows crash and lockup. Then Delta tried to cover themselves by claiming they were still dealing with the initial Crowdstrike problems for days but Microsoft refuted that and eventually Delta had to disclose the real problem to regulators and investors.

Comment Re: I really can't sympathize with Delta (Score 1) 63

The BSODs happened to everyone globally. It was only Delta who had their application layer, including the terminal emulators talking to the non Windows databases, suffer cascading failures after they'd restored Windows.

Delta had a completely unrelated latent system design problem that meant they could not recover from the systems all going down at once.

Comment Re: I really can't sympathize with Delta (Score 1) 63

Delta was down for most of a week, while their competitors were up in a day, because they had no way to bring up all their computers in a way where they didn't immediately crash each other. The terminals would overwhelm the databases, and then the terminals would hang. Most airlines didn't have this problem, so as they got their computers booting again, the network slowly came back online and back in sync.

Southwest specifically updated their systems in the last decade because of a previous outage. The "they run Windows 3.1" memes were just memes.

Comment Re: I really can't sympathize with Delta (Score 2) 63

Delta specifically were down for days because they couldn't do a cold start of their databases. Southwest was back up fastest because they had modernized and their systems came up gracefully instead of a thundering herd. The others took one day for daily batch jobs to run.

Comment Re:Why?!? (Score 1) 53

Before the prequels, it was originally a reference to Samuel Butler's late 19th century think piece about not letting machines dictate our decisions, and how that would inevitably lead to machine evolution, where the successful machines are the ones that get humans to make more machines and defer to their needs and logic. I don't think it was even explicitly about sentience, just that we'd create our own parasites.

So Dune had humans doing all the data analyses and making all decisions, with machines at least several steps away. There were also some hints of a Talmudic solution where operations that we'd use computation for were instead done by intricate mechanical devices. Apparently, the Orange Catholic god can't tell when you encode the logic to a physical process.

Comment Re:Best DE (Score 1) 33

Last time I looked (which was already years ago), it seemed like everyone involved in KDE 4, Plasma, and the semantic desktop had left. Plasma has certainly improved, but Akonadi is still there doing unspeakable things to its poor database.

Remember the KDE tablet that got delayed again and again as they found out the suppliers would swap out components whenever it was cost effective?

I do chuckle whenever someone asks why KDE doesn't write its own display manager.

Comment Re: Pluto was robbed (Score 1) 145

Didn't we go through this with all the planets that were reclassified as "asteroids" when the term was coined? In the mid 19th century, there were a lot of planets in the solar system. If they weren't going to repeat that with the Kuiper Belt objects, Pluto should have been reclassified as soon as we started finding more.

Comment Re:Ah not to worry. (Score 3, Informative) 135

We know that lack of exposure to peanuts as a baby can cause it (or exposure can prevent it, whichever way you want to see it). Studies with ethnic groups in the US and abroad where the US population didn't have peanuts in their babies' diets basically ruled out strong genetic factors.

Now, I doubt the US baby peanut intake used to be high, so there's probably another thing causing the allergy to manifest after they're not pre-emptively exposed.

Comment Re:No error (Score 2) 288

It's funny that the "biblical definitions" party never seems to use actual biblical punishments. Death for wearing mixed fabrics, two shekel damages to the father for causing a miscarriage. Mike Johnson's bible that he references must have some heavily redacted books of Deuteronomy and Leviticus.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Anyone attempting to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin." -- John Von Neumann

Working...
OSZAR »